• Contact Us
  • World-Wide Shipping
  • Shipping fee calculated at checkout
  • Purchase in SEK or EUR
0
Your cart

Recommended backlist:

..

Follow us on Instagram

Support your local art bookstore

Wherever you are

Gustav Karlsson: Real-Fantasy
Gustav Karlsson: Real-Fantasy
Gustav Karlsson: Real-Fantasy - 2
Gustav Karlsson: Real-Fantasy - 3

Gustav Karlsson: Real-Fantasy

€20

Keyword: 2020s, architecture, urban planning, spatiality

Size: 110 x 180 mm
Pages: 120
Format: softcover
Edition: 150
Illustration: in colour & b/w
Language: English
Text: Gustav Karlsson
Book design: Fält (Jesper Canell & Daniel Flodin)
Publisher: Stromboli Kust, Stockholm
Pub Year: 2025
Weight: 135 gr
ISBN: 9789153146926
Read more...

    Description

    Article no.: 9789153146926

    This stunning little book explores urban planning as a tension between utopian hopes and dystopian forecasts, questioning whether urpan planning's pursuit of growth worsens the crisis it aims to solve.

    From the publisher:
    Urban planning-a balancing act towards a more or less realized fantasy. Depending on the emotional mix of the forecast that precedes the fantasy-weighted towards either more dystopian, or more optimistic feelings-the task may not always be to blindly aim for a bright future, but to resiliently focus away from the prediction, as a kind of anti-planning. In line with some of today's most common future predictions-accelerated climate change, rising inequality, social collapse, among other apocalyptic scenarios. The prevailing overarching aim in urban planning should arguably be aligned to this anti focus, however, this does not seem to be the case.

    The following speculations in this book are all based on a premonition that the planning response needed to soft-land the predicted dystopian consequences may not be compatible with the prominent underlaying motives of urban planning-the fantasy of economic growth. This particular fantasy, and its subsequent attempts to be realized, may even be a strong contributing factor enabling the more dystopian predictions to become real-scenarios that we should try to plan away from, if we could (or wanted to). Whether one chooses to see the inherent limitations of planning, or not, one could agree that the situation is of a more psychological nature than an "urban planning challenge" waiting to be solved.
    Back to top